I do not blog for money
neither do i blog for fame
all i get is pretty lame
oh! what a shame!
Ramblings of a Software Engineer, Amusements of a Geek, Cacophony of a Guitarist, An Entropy Admirer's and an Interesting Character's Musings..
I do not blog for money
neither do i blog for fame
all i get is pretty lame
oh! what a shame!
If you would have bumped into ‘Thread Aborted Exception’ in ASP.NET apps when trying to do a lengthy server process, They would have been interesting times fore sure.
Well, Firstly , The ‘Thread Aborted Exception’ happens when the thread serving the request doesn't
finish for a long time. The ASP.NET hosting process aborts this thread after a certain time which can be adjusted in the ‘executionTimeout’ attribute of the ‘httpRuntime’ element in the ‘Web.Config’ file.
<system.web>
<httpRuntime executionTimeout="600" />
</system.web>
By default the executionTimeout="90" seconds.
Although this might solve the problem , this is not a feasible solution primarily because of scalability reasons, i.e increasing the executionTimeout might decrease the throughput of your web app.
I did an interesting workaround this to ‘ping’ the server at intervals just short of the ‘executingTimeout’ parameter. Now, the idea is, if a process/function/routine takes enormous amount of time (which happens to raise the Thread Aborted Exception) to complete because it’s massive., break the process/function/routine into smaller chunks and ping the server at regular intervals. This can be achieved by storing the execution states in a session variable on the server.
Further, this will open up an opportunity to monitor the progress of your process. Say you’ve re-factored the lengthy routine which was a single function to 10 functions. Every time you finish a function, you can update your progress on the client and continue with the next function on the server.
Advantages
1] This will avoid the ‘Thread Aborted Exception’ and
2] Progress can be monitored.
Disadvantages
1] There is an argument that any lengthy processes must not be done on the asp.net thread pool thread and that such processes should be written as a separate windows service. Well, at the end of the day it depends on your business needs. Personally, i feel you need to consider things like will the app be running on business lan or exposed to the internet , how many simultaneous users will it have ?. Will it be running on a cluster or a single server etc..